🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive move to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate worldwide. Politicians, safety advocates, and families are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will become a template for the rest of the world.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of nations are considering similar restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader arguing that phones and apps are "stealing our kids' youth". Legislation could be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the identity and age of social media account holders. Officials have suggested that an Australian-model ban could be "an options under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has asked the legislature to enact a bill raising the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar action, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has advised families to prevent their kids from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a non-binding motion demanding a ban for minors except if parental consent is granted. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these services, the resolution does not establish binding law.

"An effective age restriction is a good first step," said one parliamentarian driving the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Approach

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "no option is off the table" but insisting any decision must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Previously, interest grew behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end modified. Nonetheless, the government committed to conduct more studies the issue.

Advocacy groups have expressed concerns. A prominent charity founded by the loved ones of a girl who died after encountering dangerous online content argues that a blanket age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when teens become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the social media companies to build platforms and apps that are appropriate and age appropriate for minors," said a influential child protection advocate.

The US: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, action is largely occurring at the regional level due to country-wide inaction.

• The state of Utah mandates guardian permission for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has signed a law prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a regulation capping minors to a single hour of social media access per day, with any further time dependent on parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly enacted bills mandating guardian approval for teenagers to create social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and suggestions from certain figures to mimic Australia's example, a US-wide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Outside of these regions, additional countries are likewise taking action.

• The Malaysian government intends to prohibit social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international agencies adopt a more nuanced tone. Unicef has warned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could backfire". The organization highlights that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated youth and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this global debate evolves, the steps of this nation and its followers demonstrate that governments around the world are less and less content to delay for the industry to act voluntarily.